Get Connected
  • facebook
  • twitter
Print

Capito and McConnell actively support coal

IN March 2012, U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson ruled that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency does not have the power to retroactively veto a Clean Water Act permit the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers issued for a surface mine in Logan County.

On April 23, a three-judge panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit ruled that because the word "whenever" appears in the statute, the EPA does have that authority.

A coal company first applied for the permit in 1999. The corps issued a permit to Mingo Logan Coal Co. in January 2007.

In January 2011, the EPA revoked the permit.

Coal will not be mined. Money will not be made. Jobs will not be created.

Such is life in coal country. A distant and uncaring federal bureaucracy controls the economic lifeblood of investors, companies, families, businesses and communities, and may shut it off at any time - years after a permit is applied for, years after it is granted, and years after it is challenged in court.

Understandably, the ruling provoked an outcry from those elected to represent coal country.

Rep. Shelley Moore Capito, R-W.Va., and Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said the court's decision creates a "cloud of uncertainty" over businesses and individuals. They vowed to introduce legislation called the Coal Jobs Protection Act.

McConnell said the EPA, by endlessly delaying permits, has turned the process into "an illegitimate, back-door means to shut down coal mines permanently."

Were the Capito-McConnell bill to become law, the agency would have 270 days to make a decision on a permit and would lose the power to retroactively veto permits.

Capito said the legislation would reinstate "the vital roles that states play in finding the proper balance between jobs and the environment."

States would have final say in setting standards, and the permitting process would be expanded to include an assessment of economic impact.

It's the difference between responsive government and arrogant, top-down government.

That difference in respect for working people has made a big difference in how West Virginians vote.

Small wonder.


Print

User Comments