"If you've got a business — you didn't build that. Somebody else made that happen."
n Barack Obama, Roanoke, Va., July 13
WASHINGTON — And who might that somebody else be?
Government, says Obama.
It built the roads you drive on. It provided the teacher who inspired you. It "created the Internet."
It represents the embodiment of "we're in this together" social solidarity that, in Obama's view, is the essential origin of individual and national achievement.
To say all individuals are embedded in and the product of society is banal.
Obama rises above banality by means of fallacy: equating society with government, the collectivity with the state.
Of course we are shaped by our milieu.
ut the most formative, most important influence on the individual is not government.
It is civil society — those elements of the collectivity that lie outside government: family, neighborhood, church, Rotary club, PTA — the voluntary associations that Tocqueville understood to be the genius of America and source of its energy and freedom.
Moreover, the greatest threat to a robust, autonomous civil society is the ever-growing Leviathan state and those like Obama who see it as the ultimate expression of the collective.
Obama compounds the fallacy by declaring the state to be the font of entrepreneurial success.
How so? It created the infrastructure — roads, bridges, schools, Internet — off which we all thrive.
We don't credit the Swiss postal service with the Special Theory of Relativity because it transmitted Einstein's manuscript to the Annalen der Physik.
Everyone drives the roads, goes to school, uses the mails. So did Steve Jobs. Yet only he conceived and built the Mac and the iPad.
Obama's infrastructure argument is easily refuted by what is essentially a controlled social experiment. Roads and schools are the constant.
What's variable is the energy, enterprise, risk-taking, hard work and genius of the individual.
It is therefore precisely those individual characteristics, not the communal utilities, that account for the different outcomes.
The ultimate Obama fallacy, however, is the conceit that belief in the value of infrastructure — and willingness to invest in its creation and maintenance — is what divides liberals from conservatives.