"IT is extremely dangerous to encourage people to see themselves as exceptional, whatever the motivation."
- Vladimir Putin, Russian president, writing in The New York Times, Sept. 11.
WASHINGTON - The most interesting fact to surface in the ensuing debate over "American exceptionalism" is that the phrase was first coined by Putin's long-ago predecessor, Joseph Stalin.
Its origins stretch back to 1927, when a prominent American communist, Jay Lovestone, suggested that capitalism was so advanced in the United States that it would preclude a communist revolution here.
Stalin would have none of it, attacking "the heresy of American exceptionalism" and affirming the historical inevitability of Marx's triumph of the proletariat.
Time hasn't been kind to Marxism. Still, the underlying question remains: Is American exceptionalism just a self-congratulatory phrase or a demonstrable reality?
The evidence is mixed.
If you examine opinion polls, you cannot miss the distinctiveness of some American attitudes. One standard question asks respondents to judge which is more important - "freedom to pursue life's goals without state interference" or "state guarantees [that] nobody is in need."
By a 58 percent to 35 percent margin, Americans favored freedom over security, reports a 2011 Pew survey.
In Europe, opinion was the opposite. Germans valued protections over freedom, 62 percent to 36 percent. The results were similar for France, Britain and Spain.
Or take free will. Americans think they have it; many other nationalities dismiss it as a delusion.
Another poll question asks respondents to agree or disagree that "success in life is determined by forces outside our control."
In the Pew survey, 72 percent agreed in Germany, 57 percent in France and 50 percent in Spain.
By contrast, only 36 percent of Americans agreed in 2011, even though the country was still suffering from the Great Recession, which harmed millions and was beyond their control.
Historically, the American experiment was exceptional, as historian and conservative commentator Charles Murray shows in an elegant essay published by the American Enterprise Institute.
The United States, writes Murray, was the "first nation in the world [to] translate an ideology of individual liberty into a governing creed."
Democracies were thought to be "impracticable and unstable." Only monarchies, often claiming divine authority, could impose social order. Even Britain, whose citizens enjoyed limited political rights, adhered to this central precept.
By contrast, Americans believed that the power to govern derived from the governed.
Lincoln's celebration in the Gettysburg Address of "government of the people, by the people, for the people" strikes us as a rhetorical flourish.
But for early Americans, the survival of such a government was an obsession. It made the United States special.